1结果：治疗组的临床显效率为63.3％，总有效率为91.6％，明显优于对照组（P＜0.01）。 Results: The total obvious effective rate of SFGwas 63.3% and the total effective rate of SFG was 91.6%, which were remarkablybetter than that of the control group (N0.01). 来源：学术文献

2(2)中医证候疗效治疗组的显效率46.6%,总有效率90.2%,均优于对照组的显效率32.1%与总有效率82.1%,P<0.01。 On the aspect of the effect of TCM syndrome,remarkable curative effect (46.6%)and the totaleffective rate (90.2%) in treatment group were superior to those in control group (32.1%,82.1%,P<0.01). 来源：学术文献

3结果：心元胶囊治疗心绞痛症状的显效率为72．22％，总有效率为93．33％，疗效优于对照组的46．67％和76．67％（P＜0．05和P＜0．01）； Results:① The obvious improvement rate and total effective rate of Xinyuan Capsule in treating angina pectoris were 72 22% and 93 33% respectively,it were superior to that in control group (46 67% and 76 67% respectively, P <0 05 and P <0 01). 来源：学术文献

4结果：2个用药组有效加稍有效率皆占81％，与安慰剂组（41％）相比P＜0．01，但2个用药组的显效率皆为0。 RESULTS: The total effective rates of both group I and II were 81%, comparing with that in the placebo group (41%), P<0.01, but no one whose pain was completely relieved. 来源：学术文献

5结果 ILIB治疗组疗效明显优于对照组 ,两组治愈显效率分别为 39%和2 9 % ,总有效率为 96 %和 80 % (χ2 =4.5 6 9,P <0 .0 5 )。 Results The excellent rate of therapeutic group and control group was 39% and 29% respectively,the effective rate was separately 98.6% and 80%(P<0.05). 来源：学术文献

1治疗结果显示:显效率达69％(660/951)、好转率25％(234/951),总有效率达94％(894/951)。 The results showed that the apparent effective rate reached 69%(660/951) and the improvement was 25% (234/951) ,the total effective rate reached 94% (894/951). 来源：学术文献

2结果 :CZ组及 Cis组的显效率和总有效率分别为 86 .5 %、6 1.1%和 97.8%、90 .3% ; The prokinetic property was experimentally studied on rat.Results:The noticeable effective rate and total effective rate were 86.5%,97.8% in CZ group while 61.6%,90.3% respectively in Cis group. 来源：学术文献

3治疗后21 d,治疗组和对照组显效率分别为63.8%,39.7%,总有效率分别为88.4%,70.6%,两组差异均有显著统计学意义(P<0.01); At the 21st day,the excellence rates in the treatment and control groups were 63.8% and 39.7%,respectively(P<0.01),the total effective rates in the treatment and control group were 88.4% and 70.6%,respectively(P<0.01). 来源：学术文献

4结果 有效率 5 3 1 % ,显效率 3 7 5 % ,总有效率 90 6% ,血液流变学各项指标有明显改善。 Results after the treatment course, its effective rate amounts to 53.1%, the effectual rate was 37.5%, the total effective rate was 90.6% with significant improvement in indexes of blood rheology. 来源：学术文献

51. 临床疗效:治疗组:痊愈率 7.5%,显效率 50%,有效率 42.5%,总有效率 100%; 1. clinical effects: the curative effect rate, the conspicuous effect rate, the effective rate and the total effective rate of the experimental group was respectively 7.5%, 50%, 42.5% and 100%. 来源：学术文献

1B组显效率为 4 7 92 % (2 3/ 4 8例 ) ,总有效率为87 50 % ; C组显效率为 5 88% (2 / 34例 ) ,总有效率为 4 1 18% ; Results: (1)Short-term effect: the markedly effective rate in the three groups was 73.58%, 47.92% and 5.88% respectively, and the total effective rate was 96.23%, 87.50% and 41.18% respectively. 来源：学术文献

2克罗米芬对照组痊愈率37.5%,显效率45.0%,有效率15.0%,总有效率97.5%. In clomiphene citrate, the cured rate is 37.5%, markedly effective rate is 45.0%, effective rate is 15.0%, and the total effective rate is97. 5%. 来源：学术文献

3对照组显效98例，有效44例，无效32例，显效率56．32％，总有效率81．61％。 in the control group,98 cases were markedly effective,44 cases were improved,32 cases were ineffective,the markedly effective rate was 56 32% and total effective rate was 81 61%. 来源：学术文献

4结果：治疗组显效率和总有效率分别为52．46％ 、90．16％ ，对照组为37．04％ 、85．15％ ，两组显效率有显著性差异（P＜ 0．05）。 Results:(1)The markedly effective rate and total effective rate of treatment group are 52.46%,90.16% respectively,but of control group,37.04%,85.15% respectively. 来源：学术文献

5两组患者中医证候疗效比较,补肾活血助孕汤治疗组痊愈率40.0%,显效率46.0%,有效率12.0%,总有效率98.0%; 2. the clinical symptom effect is :In ZhuYun Decoction group, the cured rate is 40.0%, markedly effective rate is 46.0%, effective rate is 12.0%, and the total effective rate is98 . 0% . 来源：学术文献

1结果：治愈率3．1％ ，显效率21 ．9 ％ ，好转率72．7％ ，无效2 ．3 ％ ，总有效率97 ．7 ％ 。 Results: cure rateis3 .1 % ,obvious cure rate 21 .9 % , mending rate 72 .7 % , and rate of no effectis 2 .3 % . Total effective rate is 97 .7 %. 来源：学术文献

2结果:对胃溃疡的显效率由对照组的51.5%提高到82.1%,治愈率由15.2%提高到43.6%; RESULTS:The effective rates of gastric ulcer were 82.1% for oral liquid group and 51.5% for control group,and the cure rates were 43.6% and 15.2% respectively; 来源：学术文献

3结果 :治疗后试验组显效率 47 73 % ,对照组显效率 70 73 % ,有显著性差异(P <0 .0 5 )。 Results:The cure rate in the treatment group was 47.73% and 70.73% in control group,they had significant difference ( P<0.05 ). 来源：学术文献

4对照组头孢氨苄片的治愈率为56.67%,显效率为20%,有效率为10%,总有效率为86.67%。 control group of cure rate for 56.67%, show the efficiency as 20%, the obviously efficient is 10%, total and efficient is 86.67%. 来源：学术文献

5疗程均为 4周。 结果 : 验证组 (胃溃疡 12例 ,十二指肠球部溃疡 5例 ) ,治愈率 35 .3% (6 /17) ,显效率 5 8.8% (10 /17) ,总有效率 94.1% (16 /17)。 Results:The cure rate of the study group with consisted of 12 patients with gastric ulcer and 5 patients with duodenal ulcer,was 35.3%(6/17),the effectual rate was 58.8% (10/17)and the overall efficiency was 94.1%(16/17). 来源：学术文献

140例患者总有效率100％,显效率80％。 The total response rate was 100% and the marked effect was 80%. 来源：学术文献

2结果治疗组与对照组总有效率分别为95％及86．7％，显效率分别为55％及20％。 The effective rates were 95.0% and86.7% respectively and marked effective rate was 55.0% in Fu Shou Wei group and 20.0% in control group. 来源：学术文献

3炎清舒洗剂治疗霉菌性阴道炎痊愈率8.33％，显效率25.0％，总有效率70.83％； On curative effect of Candidal vagnitis, the rate of recovery of YQSL is 8. 33%, the rate of the marked effect is 25.0% , the total effective rate is 70.83%. 来源：学术文献

4148例包括慢性支气管炎和支气管哮喘在内的慢性阻塞性肺部疾病病人用合成α-细辛脑片治疗,60mg tid,连服14-21d为1疗程,临床有效率85.5％,显效率61.1％. Synthetic a-asarone was given 60mg orally tid for 14-21d. Clinical improvement was obtained in 85.5% of the patients, and marked effectiveness in 61% . 来源：学术文献

5结果 针刺组的痊愈显效率及痊愈显效者 6个月、12个月、18个月随访结果同药物组比较 ,其差异有统计学意义 (P<0 .0 1,P<0 .0 5 )。 Results Statistics showed significant differences in recovery and marked effectiveness rates and the results of 6,12 and 18 months' follow ups between acupuncture group and drug group ( P < 0.01 , P <0.05) . 来源：学术文献

1结果 :3组显效率依次为 63 % ,60 % ,86%。 A组与B组显效率P >0 .0 5,分别与C组比较显效率P<0 .0 5。 RESULTS: The obvious effective rate 63% in group A was similar to that of group B 60% ( P >0.05), but was lower than that of group C 86% ( P <0.05). 来源：学术文献

2经统计学处理,两组在显效率上有显著性差异(P<0. 05) 。 The obvious effective rate of the treated group was better than that of the controlled group(P<0.05). 来源：学术文献

3总有效率87．5％，显效率56．2％。 A totaleffective rate was 87.5%and the obvious effective rate was 56.2%. 来源：学术文献

4对照组显效率13.33％，有效率40％，总有效率53.33％。 The control group: obvious effective rate 13. 33%,effctive rate 40%,totel effective rate 53. 33%. 来源：学术文献

5对照组显效率23.37％，有效率53.34％，总有效率76.67％。 The control group: obvious effective rate 23. 37%, effective rate 53. 34%, total effective rate 76.67%. 来源：学术文献

1用安灭菌治疗总例数为102例,包括对照试验中64例与开放试验中38例,临床治愈率56.9%,显效率35.3%,进步率6.9%,失败率0.98%,治愈显效率为92.2%,细菌清除率86.7%,不良反应率8.82%。 The total number of patients treatcd by AUG was 102 cases (64 patients in controlled study and 38 patients in open trial) with a cure rate of 56.9%, excellence rate of 35.3%, improvement rate of 6.9% and failure rate of 0.98%, The cure rate plus excellence rate, bacterial clearance rate and ADR rate of 102 cases treated with AUG were 92.2%, 86.7% and 8.28%, respectively. 来源：学术文献

2结果：治疗组平均显效时间（7．5日）、显效率（78．95％）及总有效率（94．74％）均明显高于对照组（分别为13．2日、50．00％和76．67％，P均＜0．05）； Results:The mean time of obvious improvement was 7 5 days,obvious improvement rate was 78 95% and total effective rate was 94 74% in treatment group,they were higher obviously than those in control group(13 2 days,50 00% and 76 67% respectively,all P <0 05). 来源：学术文献

321例随访6～58个月(平均21.8个月),远期临床治愈—显效率为85.7%,其中大动脉炎(13/15例)为86.7%。 Among 21 of the 40 cases, long term cure/improvement rates in general and of aorto-arteritis (follow-up period of 6-58 months with an average of 21.8 months) were 85.7% and 86.7% respectively. 来源：学术文献

4结果:两组均在治疗1周即起效(P均<0.01),但6周治疗结束时,研究组显效率87.8%,对照组显效率73.3%,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。 Results: Two groups took effects at first weeked(P<0.01),but the marked improvement rate of the reserch group was 87.8%,and the control group was 73.3%,which showed significant difference after 6 weeks treatment. 来源：学术文献

5虽与对照组总有效率（82.4％）比较,差异无显著性（P>0.05）,但显效率均明显高于对照组（P<0.01,P<0.05）,且不良反应较少。 and they are slightly higher than that of the control (82. 4% . P>0. 05). But the remarkable improvement rates of the mucilloid and the suppositoria were significantly higher than that of the control(P<0. 01 ,P<0. 05)and the former had low sideeffects. 来源：学术文献

1结果:活血化瘀组的显效率(47.5%)及总有效率(95.1%)和NBNA评分(38.7)显示其疗效高于对照组的34.7%、86.9%、37.4。 Results:47.5%of the excellent rateand 95.1%of the total effective rate,38.7% scores in treated group were high than the 34.7%,86.9%and 37.4 scores in the control group,but there was no significant difference between two groups. 来源：学术文献

2经统计学处理两组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但显效率分别为75.8%、55.0%,采用χ2检验(P<0.05)两组差异有统计学意义; The excellent rates of stenocardia relief in the both groups were 75.8% and 55.0% respectively,which were significant difference in chi-squared test. 来源：学术文献

3基于症状积分下降指数的四级疗效评估显示 ,咪唑斯汀的总有效率为 90 .1% ,其中显效率为 5 2 .1% ,而氯雷他定组分别为 85 .1%和 4 5 .9%。 Efficacy assessment based on symptom score reducing index (SSRI) showed that the efficacy of Mizolastine was 90.1%, and the excellent rate was 52.1%,while the efficacy of Loratadine was 85.1%, and the excellent rate was 45.9%. 来源：学术文献

4结果 试验组和对照组的临床显效率分别为 6 6 .7%和 73.3% ( P>0 .0 5 ) ; Results The two drugs' clinical excellent rates wer e 6 6.7% and 73.3%; 来源：学术文献

5治疗6d后的治愈率、显效率、有效率分别为20%、65%、100%; The cure rate was 20%, the excellent rate was 65% and the good rate was 100% after 6 days of treatment by the drug of treatment group; 来源：学术文献

1有效率(发作频率减少50%以上)91.67%,显效率(发作频率减少75%以上)81.25%,效差或无效8.33%。 The effective rate(there was a more than 50% reduction in seizure frequency) was 91.67%,the significant effective rate(there was a more than 75% reduction in seizure frequency) was 81.25%,the poor or invalid rate was 8.3%. 来源：学术文献

2结果 :临床患者 3组总有效率分别为90 .0 %、76 .3%和 80 .0 % ,中医治疗组显效率显著高于西医对照组 (P<0 .0 1) ; Results:The total effective rate in TCM,WM and Qingkailing groups were 90 0%,76 3% and 80 0% respectively. The significant effective rate of the TCM therapy group was higher than that of the WM therapy group ( P <0 01). 来源：学术文献

31.疾病综合疗效评定两组比较 治疗组治愈11例,显效8例,有效16例,无效5例,治愈率和显效率之和为47.5%,总有效率为87.5%; Results 1.The total effective rates of clinical symptoms In therapy group the significant effective rates and cure rates are 47.5% , the total effective rates are 87. 5% and in control group the number are 45. 0% and 80.0% . 来源：学术文献

4结果:本组82例中采用肛门后方切开加改良Block修补术治疗直肠前突型便秘,手术总有效率为96%、其中痊愈率为67%、显效率为18%、有效率为11%、无效率为4%。 Results All 82 patients with constipation of anterior rectocele were operated with combined posterior resection of anus and modified Block's technique, the overall effective rate was 96%, including the cure rate was 67%, the significant effective rate 18%, effective rate 11%, and no effect in 3 cases (4%). 来源：学术文献

51．临床智能疗效(ADAS-cog)比较：服药3个月，治疗组显效11例，进步8例，无退步7例，无效2例，显效率39.3％，总进步率67.9％； Result1 .The therapeutic efficiency of ADAS-cog :after the treatment of the 90th day, significant effective rates of ADAS-cog are 39.3% and 21.4% in treatment group and contrast group respectively. 来源：学术文献

1结果治愈率为83.8%(57/68),显效率为13.2%(9/68),有效率为2.9%(2/68)。 Results Cure rate was 83.8%(57/68),obvious efficiency rate was 13.2%(9/68),efficient rate was 2.9%(2/68). 来源：学术文献

2结果：(1)PRL①男性组4天PRL≥69.2μg／L的总体显效率(5／5)比＜69.2μg／L的(7／22)显著为高(P＜0.001)； Results: 1. PRL There was significantly higher PRL level in risperidone group(P<0.05), there was significantly higher PRL level in female subjects(P<0.05), and significantly higher efficiency rate of BPRS score on day 29 displayed in the male subjects with PRL > 69.2μg/L than in those with PRL<69.2ug/L(P<0.05). 来源：学术文献

3而烟酸肌醇组显效率为26.7％，总有效率为60％。 group the marked efficiency rate is 26.7% only, and general effective rate 60%. 来源：学术文献

4胃镜疗效:治疗组痊愈率24.09%,显效率45.78%,有效率21.69%,无效率8.43%; Curative effect in electro-gastroscope examination : Completelyrecovered rate of the treatment group was 24.09%, significant effect rate was 45. 78%, effect rate was 21. 69%, inefficiency rate was 8. 43%; 来源：学术文献

5对照组痊愈率20.93%,显效率48.84%,有效率13.95%,无效率16.28%。 completely recovered rate of the matched controlled group was 20.93%, significant effect rate was 48. 78%, effect rate was 13. 95%, inefficiency rate was 16. 28%. 来源：学术文献

1治疗组总有效率为78.8%,显效率为54.5%; 对照组总有效率是54.3%,显效率是28.6%; The total effective rate and the excellence rate were 78.8% and 54.5% in treatment group,while they were 54.3% and 28.6% respectively in control group. 来源：学术文献

2用安灭菌治疗总例数为102例,包括对照试验中64例与开放试验中38例,临床治愈率56.9%,显效率35.3%,进步率6.9%,失败率0.98%,治愈显效率为92.2%,细菌清除率86.7%,不良反应率8.82%。 The total number of patients treatcd by AUG was 102 cases (64 patients in controlled study and 38 patients in open trial) with a cure rate of 56.9%, excellence rate of 35.3%, improvement rate of 6.9% and failure rate of 0.98%, The cure rate plus excellence rate, bacterial clearance rate and ADR rate of 102 cases treated with AUG were 92.2%, 86.7% and 8.28%, respectively. 来源：学术文献

3疗效分析:(1)智能疗效:两组疗效构成、显效率、有效率等,组间差异无统计意义(P>0.05); Effectiveness analysis: (1) Intelligence effectiveness: The difference between two groups in effectiveness composition, excellence rate and effective power weren’t statistics significance. 来源：学术文献

4(3)中医证候疗效:两组疗效构成、临床痊愈率、显效率等,组间差异无统计意义(P>0.05); (3) TCM syndrome effectiveness: The difference of effectiveness composition, clinical recovery rate and excellence rate between two groups weren’t statistics significance. 来源：学术文献

5治疗后21 d,治疗组和对照组显效率分别为63.8%,39.7%,总有效率分别为88.4%,70.6%,两组差异均有显著统计学意义(P<0.01); At the 21st day,the excellence rates in the treatment and control groups were 63.8% and 39.7%,respectively(P<0.01),the total effective rates in the treatment and control group were 88.4% and 70.6%,respectively(P<0.01). 来源：学术文献

1结果:利培酮组、奥氮平组和奎硫平组的显效率分别为44%、88%、76%,奥氮平组和奎硫平组的疗效要好于利培酮组。 Results:the response rates of risperidone group 44%,olanzapine group 88%,and seroquel group 76%,olanzapine group and seroquel group demonstrated higher efficacy than risperidone group. 来源：学术文献

2青银注射液显效率为76.9％,有效率为13.0％,总有效率为89.9％。 The rate of marked effectiveness of Qingyin injection was 76.90％. the response rate was 13.0％. The total response rate was 89.9％. 来源：学术文献

3结果表明:治疗组显效率为60%,有效率30%,无效率10%; The res- ults show that in the experimental group the remarkable response rate ie 60%,the response rate is 30%,and the no-response rate is 10%. 来源：学术文献

4显效率117/156(75.0％),有效率31/156(19.9％),总有效率94.9％。 The marked response rate was 117/156 (75.0%) and the response rate was 31/156 (19,9%), the total response rate was 94.9%. 来源：学术文献

5结果:前者显效率为79％,显著高于后者42％(P<0.05)。 Results showed the response rate of timolol group was 79%, compared with 42% of the propranolol group (P<0. 05). 来源：学术文献

1结果 :经治疗 2 4周后 ,LEF组有效率和显效率分别为 81.5 4%和 36 .92 % ,MTX组分别为 75 .81%和 35 .48%。 不良反应发生率LEF组和MTX组分别为 15 .39%和 2 6 .47%。 Results:The effective rate and significantly effective rate for LEF group were 81.54% and 36.92% respectively and for MTX group were 75.81% and 35.48% respectively with no significant difference between groups. 来源：学术文献

2结果：治疗组和对照组的临床治愈率、显效率、有效率、总有效率分别为23.33％、22.22％、30％、75.56％、和13.33％、23.33％、21.67％、58.33％。 Results: The Curative rate, significantly effective rate, effective rate and total effective rate of the test group were 23.33%, 22.22%, 30% and 75.56% and those of the control group were 13.33%, 23.33%, 21.67% and 58.33% respectively. 来源：学术文献

31.在总体疗效上,治疗组与对照组比较差异无显著意义(P>0.05),说明治疗组与观察组总体疗效一致,但治疗组治愈率和显效率分别是33.3%和46.7%,高于对照组。 The healed rate (33.3%) and the significantly effective rate (46.7%) of fire needle group were higher the general acupuncture group. 来源：学术文献

4对108例头晕症状总显效率为56．5％，总有效率为83．3％。 On 108 cases of dizziness symptom,the total significantly effective rate was 56.5%,and the total effective rate was 83.3%. 来源：学术文献

5显效率川芎嗪为36．67％，硝酸甘油组为10．00％，两组比较有极显著性差异（P＜0．001）； The significantly effective rate was 36 67% in “chuanxiongqin”group and 10 00% in nitroglycerin group with a very significant difference between the two groups( P <0 01). 来源：学术文献

1结果：秋泻糖浆治疗组的显效率为75.00％、对照组为51.47％，治疗组明显优于对照组(P＜0.05)； Results: the obvious effect rate in 3 days of the treated group was75%. significantly higher than that of the control group(51.47%,P<0.05). 来源：学术文献

2常规治疗组显效率36.3％，总有效率72.7％，丹参治疗组显效率65.6％，总有效率为93.7％，两者临床疗效有显著性差异 In group B and group A , the obvious effect rates were 65. 6% and 36.3%, the total effect rates were 93.7% and 72.7% respectively, The 来源：学术文献

3对照组心绞痛显效率为48.6％,尿激酶组为95.3％,差异非常显著(P<0.01)。 The obvious effect rate in treatment group (95. 3%) was significantly higher than that in control group (48.6%). (P<0.01). 来源：学术文献

4结果 总有效率 ,治疗组 80 % ,对照组 68.6% ,经统计学处理无显著差异 ( P >0 .0 5) ; 显效率 ,治疗组40 % ,对照组 1 4.3% ,统计学处理差异显著 ( P <0 .0 5)。 Results There was not significant difference in the total efficiency rate between treatment group and control group( 80.0% vs 68.6%, P>0.05 ), but the obvious effect rate ( 40.0%) was markedly higher in treatment group than that in control group(14.3%),(P<0.01). 来源：学术文献

5结果：治疗组痊愈率46．2％，显效率41．6％、有效率7．9％、总有效率95．7％； Results: The curative effect rate in the treatment groups was 46. 2%. obvious effect rate 41. 6%, effective rate 7.9%, the total effect rate 95. 7 %; 来源：学术文献

1如图1C中可见，光导的厚度d可以减少至基本上在第一估计0.79mm以下而无明显效率减少。 As can be seen in FIG. 1C, the thickness d of the light guide may be reduced substantially below the first estimate 0.79 mm without significant efficiency reductions. 来源：专利文献 中文专利号：CN102576134A 英文专利号：US2012163014

2结果：总有效率94．1％，显效率64.1％，明显高于单用药物治疗的显效率，说明综合治疗可提高疗效，减少后遗症及致残率，且病程超短，疗效越好，是治疗脑梗塞的好方法。 The total efficiency was 94.1％, and the significant efficiency was 67. 7 ％ It suggested that comprehensive treatment was an effecient way to deal with cerebral infarction. 来源：学术文献

3总之，除2倒无变化（7．41％），1例变差（3．7％）外，显效率为25．93％，有效率为88．89％。 The significant efficiency was 25. 93 %,the efficiency was 88. 89 % except that 2 objects did not change and one continued to deteriorate. 来源：学术文献

4而红霉素组显效率 6 6 7% ,总有效率 4 0 0 %。 The total efficiency of group of erythromycin was 400%,and the significant efficiency was 667%. 来源：学术文献

5然而，由于生产不含明显效率降低缺陷的大晶体所固有的问题，有效的晶体基器件特别是大表面面积器件的生产是困难和昂贵的。 However, efficient crystalline-based devices, especially of large surface area, are difficult and expensive to produce due to the problems inherent in producing large crystals without significant efficiency-degrading defects. 来源：专利文献 中文专利号：CN102334209A 英文专利号：US2011012091

1结果 :西酞普兰显效率 79% ,阿米替林组显效率 75% (P >0 .0 5) ,西酞普兰组不良反应较阿米替林组少。 RESULTS: In the group A and B, the excellent effective rate was 79 % and 75 %, respectively, there was no significant different between two groups( P >0.05), but group A had less adverse reactions. 来源：学术文献

2磁热振仪磁场强度为120～620Gaus，温度为40～60℃。 结果单纯牵引组治愈显效率42％； Magnetic field strength of the MVH instrument was 120～620 Gauss and temperature was 40～60℃ Results The excellent effective rate of the single traction group was 42%. 来源：学术文献

3结果显示：治疗组显效率明显优于对照组（P＜0．01）； The results showed that the excellent effective rate in group of complex therapy was markedly superior to that in control group(P<0.01); 来源：学术文献

4结果 养心通脉合剂临床近期治愈率为13.11% ,显效率为 36 .0 7% ,总有效率为 93.44 % ; RESULT:In treatment group with Yangxin Tongmai Mixture, the clinical short-term curative rate was 13.11%, excellent effective rate was 36.07%, general effective rate was 94.44%; 来源：学术文献

1结果:两组均在治疗1周即起效(P均<0.01),但6周治疗结束时,研究组显效率87.8%,对照组显效率73.3%,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。 Results: Two groups took effects at first weeked(P<0.01),but the marked improvement rate of the reserch group was 87.8%,and the control group was 73.3%,which showed significant difference after 6 weeks treatment. 来源：学术文献

2结果:治疗组显效率43.3%,总有效率70.0%; 对照组显效率为20.0%,总有效率为53.3%,差异均有显著性意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。 Results:marked improvement rate was 43.3% and total effective rate was 70.0% in treatment group,compared to 20.0% and 53.3% in control group. 来源：学术文献

3其显效率38.59％,有效率77.72％,无效率22.28％。 The marked improvement rate was38.59%, the effective rate was 77.72%, the ineffective rate was 22.28%. 来源：学术文献